-
"The new motto should be: “Get playful, get experimental - or stay behind.” and applies especially to companies and organisations." Ooooooh, yes.
May 2009 Archives
A video reaction to the recent UK parliament expenses scandal:
The creator blogs for Computer Weekly.
The creator blogs for Computer Weekly.
Hectic day. Just wanted to link a couple of things I've been involved with:
- Helped get a new blog live for Estates Gazette
- Got involved in an interesting discussion over the nature of blogging over on my World of Warcraft blog
What a fantastic experiment:
"Moderation in everything," my late mother used to say, somewhat ironically given how much unused wool and unpainted china she left behind. But, like many clichés, it has a deep element of truth, as I've discovered by disconnecting somewhat from my normal blogging-twittering-photographing lifestyle. A quiet weekend with friends and family, as well as a rather sobering visit to my parents' grave (to check the newly-placed gravestone with Mum's name added) have helped put many things back in their proper perspective, and that's valuable.
The one big danger of social media, I think, is also its strength - its ability to connect you with like minds. If you don't move outside the tight circle of people just like you, you can start seeing things in a distorted way, leading to a bubble mentality. This is one reason I value being married to a social media sceptic. Perspective is important, and sometime you have to step back to get it.
I've yet to open my feed reader, which is likely to be a place of horror and despair after 5 days away from it, but I'm glad I took the break.
Sorry for the unannounced silence, but I'm back in business.
The one big danger of social media, I think, is also its strength - its ability to connect you with like minds. If you don't move outside the tight circle of people just like you, you can start seeing things in a distorted way, leading to a bubble mentality. This is one reason I value being married to a social media sceptic. Perspective is important, and sometime you have to step back to get it.
I've yet to open my feed reader, which is likely to be a place of horror and despair after 5 days away from it, but I'm glad I took the break.
Sorry for the unannounced silence, but I'm back in business.
Joanna Geary: Twitter us another way of finding you local community online and interacting with them.
Christian Payne: Geri Jackson (sp?) - evicted from Zimbabwe, broadcast into the country. Blocked. Now texts into there. 400k texts a month. One third of population left, but leave a mobile there to communicate with family. How get free texts into Zimbabwe?
Paul Bradshaw: Distribution is now journalists' responsibility. Can you organize users to cover events?
Simon Grice: setting up a local news site. At a local level, people are interested in things that happen where they live. Unique opportunity for local news to harness this medium to serve audience.
Monetization:
PB: tools and services around news
SG: local ads
JG: no-one has the answer. We don't sell content, we sell audiences. Audiences follow you because you have something to say. We need to look again at what people want from us.
SG: We need to rethink what localization means, when you don't have a fixed distribution base.
PB: Need to create a newsroom without walls. Connected journalism.
JG: For traditional journalists, social media are a scary lot. Taking meetings face to face cements online relationships.
CP: I'm glad the advertising model is lying kicking and screaming in the gutter.
PB: Publishers not throwing enough money at innovation.
SG: Publishers not looking at the innovation in startups.
Christian Payne: Geri Jackson (sp?) - evicted from Zimbabwe, broadcast into the country. Blocked. Now texts into there. 400k texts a month. One third of population left, but leave a mobile there to communicate with family. How get free texts into Zimbabwe?
Paul Bradshaw: Distribution is now journalists' responsibility. Can you organize users to cover events?
Simon Grice: setting up a local news site. At a local level, people are interested in things that happen where they live. Unique opportunity for local news to harness this medium to serve audience.
Monetization:
PB: tools and services around news
SG: local ads
JG: no-one has the answer. We don't sell content, we sell audiences. Audiences follow you because you have something to say. We need to look again at what people want from us.
SG: We need to rethink what localization means, when you don't have a fixed distribution base.
PB: Need to create a newsroom without walls. Connected journalism.
JG: For traditional journalists, social media are a scary lot. Taking meetings face to face cements online relationships.
CP: I'm glad the advertising model is lying kicking and screaming in the gutter.
PB: Publishers not throwing enough money at innovation.
SG: Publishers not looking at the innovation in startups.
Panel chained by Laura Oliver of Journalism.co.uk
Suw Charman-Anderson is talking about Ada Lovelace day, an event to celebrate women in technology, and give women good technology role models. They had 1000 people sign up in the first day, and meme mainly spread through Twitter. The Facebook group was closed and inwards-looking and many people who joined the events page didn't sign up to the pledge. Twitter spread the idea widely through retweeting. Will be more Ada Lovelace events and another day next year.
Kevin Anderson is up next, talking about twittering and blogging his way across the US for the presidential election. Use Twitter to crowd-source question. Took him back to his early reporting days in Kansas. Blogging brought him back that sense of immediacy that he lost when he went to national press. "The worst thing is to be in the field and not to be able to file". The US trip was an experiment - came down to blog as the hub, with Facebook, Twitter and Flickr as the main tools. @s and DMs while he was moving - a 2 month conversation in the field with his audience. Met people and made contact (ie built community) as he went. Found it difficult to aggregate everything they did in one place on the site - hard to add the right context. And how do you aggregate the interaction?
Continue reading Media140: Success & Failures With Twitter Journalism.
First panel discussion - five white males, points out Bill Thompson.
Difference between PA and Twitter is between newspaper front page and an ocean, says Mike Butcher.
Jon Grimpton says that Sky use search terms during breaking news events. Generally, they're just monitoring Twitter. PA is just a potential source of stories - so is Twitter if you use the tools around it.
Bill Thompson: old school journalism should be allowed to continue so we can all experience its death throes. It's missing the point of Twitter. It's the Id unleashed. Like ESP with no filters.
Darren Waters: foolish of any news organisation to ignore the flow of information in Twitter. BBC has a user-generated content hub, who sources information from the audience.
Nick Halstead: Pairing of blogging and Twitter is giving a wide reach to the small blogger. (Content marketing, essentially). The future is all about sites that discover the trending stories.
Mike Butcher: 5 years ago we would have been having mediaTechnorati, but that's now something of an also-ran. I was late because I was breaking a story.
BT: Did you call them to ask if it was true?
Continue reading Media140: How Will Twitter Change News Reporting?.
Pat Kane is first up, showing us a picture of Dick Tracey with his wrist communication device - something for us all to aspire to, right?
Social Media lets you play at being a journalist - and play is an ambiguous term - are you a player or are you being trivial?
Journalism becomes quotidian in this environment - you can produce it on the same street corner you used to buy your newspaper.
- Beat reporting (content search, geolocation)
- Early warning of events/news
- Real time content/reporting
- Traceable sources for leads and interviewing
- "can you help" - audience interaction
- Promo tool (content marketing)
- Expertise archive
Desk research becomes handheld device responsiveness as you react to the community's collaborative decision as to what is important.
Who verifies flows of information? All news is a narrative that is constructed by groups. Truth is balkanised - which is an interesting niche for existing brands. Can they be the people who frame the tumult?
Continue reading Media140: Opening Sessions.
-
Not sure that I agree with all five points made in here, but they're certainly thought-provoking.
I knew I liked Waitrose.
(Yes, Farmer's Weekly is one of ours. Although, I have no idea how many farmers shop in the Beckenham store...)
It started with a tweet:
And soon it spiralled into quite a discussion on Twitter and even a blog post on Strange Attractor. I don't have a lot to add to what Kevin says there (but I do recommend that you go take a peek), other than to recount how I came to tweet that in the first place. I'd overheard a conversation between colleagues, wherein one was expressing surprise that nobody had responded to their first forum posting.
And I come across this a lot. Journalists are genuinely surprised when their new blog or newly-launched forum aren't instantly innundated with hordes of readers. In fact, I remember a Daily Telegraph political reporter expressing this very shock at an event Shane Richmond hosted a couple of years back.
And I come across this a lot. Journalists are genuinely surprised when their new blog or newly-launched forum aren't instantly innundated with hordes of readers. In fact, I remember a Daily Telegraph political reporter expressing this very shock at an event Shane Richmond hosted a couple of years back.
Continue reading Entitlement, Page Views and Content Atomisation.
There is, I think, a tendency for journalists to over-complicate social media and how they talk about it. Somehow they makes something which is fundamentally just about talking to people, well, hard. Look at the recent kerfuffle about the WSJ guidelines for using social sites.
There is a remedy for this. And Ryan has just published it.
Friday night saw me at #TweetupLondon, an impromptu drinkies session after the Somesso 09 conference. Good beer, good conversation and a good time.
Here's a wee bit of video I shot, featuring Jason Falls, Andy Piper, Dennis Howlett, Andrea Vascellari and Sarah Blow, as well as others whose names elude me.
TweetupLondon from Adam Tinworth on Vimeo.
Oh, and there are some photos on Flickr, too.
It's nearly the weekend. And we know what this weekend brings, don't we?
Eurovision.
Now, we might be lacking Terry Wogan this year, so can I recommend a whole different kind of coverage for you? Mr Ewan Spence, a mad Scotsman whom I've run around New York and Paris with (but never anywhere in the UK, strangely), is over in Moscow reporting on the thing, in an online, new-media kind of way. In fact, he's been doing so all week, so you can head over to his site to get your preparation done for tomorrow night's Eurovision extravaganza.
And just to whet your appetite, here's his 50 Fun Facts about the Eurovision:
Eurovision.
Now, we might be lacking Terry Wogan this year, so can I recommend a whole different kind of coverage for you? Mr Ewan Spence, a mad Scotsman whom I've run around New York and Paris with (but never anywhere in the UK, strangely), is over in Moscow reporting on the thing, in an online, new-media kind of way. In fact, he's been doing so all week, so you can head over to his site to get your preparation done for tomorrow night's Eurovision extravaganza.
And just to whet your appetite, here's his 50 Fun Facts about the Eurovision:
-
"What I think she's saying is that readers have been used to paying something to receive the news in a convenient format. I would argue that if you take away the format, paper, then you take away the reason to pay." - So can we create a new reason?
-
Wow. The WSJ completely missed the point here.
-
This shift towards digital learning on journalism course could have interesting side-effects.
-
Nice summation of the reasons commenting goes bad on many mainstream media sites
-
Stumbling blocks for paywalls (mixing my metaphors nicely, there)
-
Can we all collectively get over this whole "blogs are rubbish" thing now, please
-
One of my photos used under a Creative Commons licence on Lifehacker
CoverItLive event on journalism.co.uk
I've never really liked the name "liveblogging" being applied to CoverItLive, because there was an established meaning for that term, and CoverItLive is something distinctly different. And I was delighted to hear Keith McSpurren from the company describe very similar reservations.
He's played with other names and straplines - "AltCaster" - "There's more to be said" - but the current pairing have stuck.
So, what was the inspiration? "There is this terrible movie called Showgirls. I was forced to watch it twice." Once was his wife's "bad movie" night. Once was with his brother, with an hilarious commentary on DVD - that derivative content was what made it work for him.
Since then, its moved to 40% of CoverItLive used being non-derivative - ie an event in its own right.
It's all about holding readers for long periods of time. Most monetisation has come from sponsorships.
What people like:
- Easy to use
- Can start using it without the IT department getting involved.
- It's a broadcast tool - designed for large audiences.
Business model is to charge large organisations for the higher-level admin tools.
Continue reading CoverItLive for Journalists: City Uni Event.
-
This could change everything. Or be an embarrassing mess…
What's the ratio of press coverage to deaths for swine flu?
I love this because (a) it's a really good example of how to do a feature visually and (b) because it shows you how massively distorting our current news values can be.
[via O'Reilly Radar]
-
Key quote: "We have a strong position that makes it relatively straightforward for us to have a subscription model, and I don’t see any reason why that can’t be replicated in other categories like consumer categories, for example. But you have got to have that quality and uniqueness." And how much journalism really falls into that category?
-
Sounds like essential reading for journalists looking to become entrepreneurs...
-
Vast picture library from the magazine goes online. Fascinating.
-
The revenue crisis in publishing is pushing pay walls back onto the agenda - this is a good, level-headed take on it.
The London Evening Standard: free for one day only!
Yes, from lunchtime today onwards, distributors in lurid orange t-shirts were distributing free copies of the new-look Evening Standard to Londoners.
Well, all it did for me was convince me not to shell out for the Standard ever again. Why? Well, take a look at the lead story - a city "tycoon" in a divorce case has revealed that he was keeping two families. And this is the biggest story in one of the greatest cities in the world?
Continue reading What A Free Evening Standard Did For Me.
Doodle done by one of the attendees at our Online Communities workshop
Time Out's Big Smoke blog makes a valid point about London blogging:
However, if we are looking at north vs south, one thing stands out: when it comes to blogging, the south wins hands down,and the south-east in particular.
As someone who used to be a south-east London blogger (before I got distracted by this whole journalism thing), I couldn't agree more. However, the 853 blog identifies a key reason why this might be:
The main reason is because this corner of the capital has, frankly been ignored by the rest of the media for decades. The Tube network barely touches it, so it may as well not exist to the kind of closed-minded north/west London media type who gets a nosebleed more than a mile off the Underground system. I get as pissed off as anyone with tedious misrepresentation of south-east London in the media, and most of it's down to sheer laziness and ignorance. The South London Press (no coverage east of Deptford) aside, local media's a bit of a joke so it's quite easy to tell a story that, simply, isn't being told.
And for us still in the media, that's something to remember. Because the new breed of publisher - the ones doing it for pure passion, at virtually no cost - will and up wounding us where we're weakest. Because we've neglected parts of our audience, pandered to our own prejudices and missed opportunities.
Today, in Birmingham, a whole group of journalists is meeting, discussing new journalism models.
You can follow proceedings live on the Online Journalism Blog. Other coverage is being aggregated on the JeeCamp site.
-
Prediction: we'll see more "reverse" social networks in the next year, where existing services gain social features
-
This looks great. I run a couple of blogs on Typepad and I can't wait.
An e-mail dropped into my inbox last week, encouraging me to have a peek at FT Arena, a blog on the Financial Times site that allows readers to join in a debate on the editorial before it's published. Karl is fond of sharing the story from his days as editor of Computer Weekly. They had a guest editor for one issue, who sat in on various editorial conferences, an eye-opening experience for him. Much of the material in those discussions never made it into the magazine - and that seemed like a loss to him.
I've long wanted to see us do a real "behind the scenes" blog, sharing the though-processes behind the creation of an issue with the readers - and involving them in that process. Arena does exactly that for a very specific section of the FT, and does it pretty well. At the moment comments on posts vary between around 20 down to none. But it's an interesting experiment, and I wonder how long it will before other titles follow suit.
Hand sanitisers have appeared by the lifts at RBI's Procter Street offices:
-
Breakdown of the key characteristics of online communities, and its distinction from an affinity group.
-
Aggregation will play an important role in the future of telegraph.co.uk
-
A useful look at aggregation workflows using Publish2
-
Ah, I recognise every single one of these archetypes.
More frightening thoughts for print journalists:
For print newspapers to continue to exist at all, their production must become radically more efficient, and for journalism to thrive, energies and efforts must be redirected at digital media and new products.Once upon a time, I was a feature editor, before I accepted the editorial development job for the whole company. I'm not sure I agree that the job is entirely gone just yet - it needs to evolve into a wider "in-depth" content role, producing content for both print and web. But yes, expecting to hold a features editor job until retirement will only work if you're retiring in the next few months.
If you are a wire editor or features editor, your odds of surviving in such a position until retirement are slim to none. Those jobs are obsolete. We can not save a system in which thousands of people sit around reinventing the wheel in parallel processes all around the country.
That said, I also think we'll see an increasing shift towards journalists becoming beat-defined, rather than content-type defined and, in that sense, the news reporter job is just as doomed as the feature writer.
Depressing news of the day - the big three US business magazines are in a bad financial place.
Let's hope they find a route out of this,
[via Adrian Monck]
Grabbed on my Flip Mino HD, edited in the flip software:
London May Day Protests 2009 from Adam Tinworth on Vimeo.
If I'd had my MacBook with me, I'd still have used iMovie and edited it much more tightly. Trimming clips isn't that easy in the Flip's own software. But in terms of getting good stuff up quickly, the Flip hits the spot...
