One Man and His Blog: June 2010 Archives

June 2010 Archives

June 30, 2010

Hiatus

As I mentioned last week - I'm in need of a break. And I think, for my sanity, it's worth taking a break from this blog, too.

Expect little or no activity here for the next ten days - and see you the other side, hopefully revived and refreshed. ;-)

June 25, 2010

news:rewired - Future of the Niche - #newsrw

Hannah Waldram

Graduated from Cardiff just as the recession hit - so went home and set up Bournville Village, a local blog. Worked with Podnosh. Is now The Guardian's beat blogger in Cardiff. No office, just her and her laptop. Teamed up with mysociety to provide information which encourages civic engagement.

Kit: laptop, smartphone, handheld cameras and a gorillapod. Uses Google Reader, and Twitter trends, tags and saves in delicious. WordPress for blogging, ScribbleLive for liveblogging. Bambuser for live video, Vimeo for uploads. Just started using AudioBoo. Has a great Flickr community, and also uses TwitPic. Accesses open data sources, like mysociety, Help Me Investigate. Many Eyes and ZeeMaps aren't very user-friendly but are useful. Scribd great for letters or documents.

Philip Trippenbach

Challenged the assumption that stories are everything. They impose a false narrative with characters, plotline, etc that doesn't suit everything. People learn more when they engage with things rather than just read them - Civilization (a game) is being used to teach history. Maybe games are the future of journalism?

Kevin Anderson

The story as the atomic unit of journalism is denying us commercial opportunities. There are no easy answers - if anyone tells you that, fire them. In 2000 there was an IndyMedia guy live streaming police from a black MacBook. We're too slow to take advantage of new tools.

There's a project to publish a newspaper just using free and open source tools. That's what we need to be doing. In 2008 he ran social media coverage across America during the elections from his mobile phone. People are running a newspaper purely using free or open source tools.

However, the lack of innovation spreads further than just the newsroom. The commercial side is as bad. The FT is doing good commercial innovation in the UK - but how about the News Room - a combine newsroom and coffee shop?

Suzanne Kavanagh

She's talking about the significant changes in journalist skillsets - Core journalistic skills, surrounded by degrees of specialisation is different platforms and tools for spreading news. People need to play to their own strengths - don't try to be everything, specialise and train in what you're inclined towards.

It's no longe enough to have the core skills - you need to pick'n'mix in the digital space, too.

Basic Skills

SK: The core skills are the same, but there's also a need for basic skills, say, filming with a Flip cam

PT:  Everyone needs the ability to connect, to work together, to use collective intelligence.

KA: Not some much skillset as mindset. If I had a pound for every time I've heard "it's not my job", I'd be rich. It's the art of the possible. I can't code, but I know when an Interactive might be appropriate.

HW: Shorthand, chatting to contacts are still core to what I do. Not everyone has to learn how to use audio, but you can learn to use a Flip in 10 minutes - you turn a red button on and off.

KA: There's a disenchantment with the everyone does everything approach. Move to playing to strengths, and a multi-skilled team.

Karl Schneider from the audience: There's still an instinct to go "what shall I write about this?" That mindset needs to be broken.

General agreement that it's about choosing the appropriate medium for the story, rather than forcing the story into the medium.

Just got sucked in, when someone said that we have standards that set us apart from the amateurs. Yes, we do. And sometimes they're lower, more abusive and more exploitative than the amateurs. There's plenty of great, high principled amateurs out there.

PT: If I was (through some huge error) in a position to hire journalists, I'd ask where they blog. If they didn't, goodbye. iPhones now have 720p HD video, soon it'll be on every crappy mobile phone. There's no excuse.

KA: We take data and structure it into a particular story. There's nothing you can do with it after that. There are businesses who are built on adding back in the metadata that we take out of the story.

PT: You can convey the function basis of an activity through interaction without any narrative. That's the link with games. A game like Budget Hero - where you had to cut the deficit - could teach the situation.

Audience Member: That's not journalism: that's education. Your teaching people someone, but are you informing them? (Me: how can you teach without informing someone...?)

KA: There's a problem with the value of writing over the value of reporting, and they're not the same thing.

If you were starting today, would you join a big company, or go entrepeneurial?

SK: I'd go small and go netrepeneurual

PT: I used to think that the BBC is like an aircraft carrier, really hard to turn around. I know now it's like a planet, it creates its own gravitation effect. Your plugged into something huge and powerful, but you're a tiny part of it.

KA: I've seen it all from a tiny newspaper in Kansas to the BBC. Some of the things I want to do require a level of autonomy you can't get in a large audience. I'm an autonomy freak. WHen I joined the BBC website, I was part of a very well-funded, very collegiate start-up.

PT: It's not like that any more.

KA: Now there's just as much risk in a big company as there are in a startup.

HW: I've done both. I'm being paid to do something local for a big company.

And we're done - can I have a beer now, please?

news:rewired Interactive Graphics

Key points emerging from the Interactives session:

  • Interactive graphics need a clear defined purpose. Understand what the users can get out of it, and what makes it different from a static graphic.
  • They take time to produce, so think in terms of updating them to keep them useful over time.
  • Pick a concept that has "legs" in the first place - that won't get old fast.
  • Coders and designers are different - and you need both
  • You can use human curation of information into the interactive display to add value
  • Old content can be valuable in them - all the BBC's stories around the 2012 olympics will get new value when the Games start
  • Do you want users to "consume" or "interact"? Pick.
  • It should be a story in its own right, not an addendum to one.
  • People still mainly using Flash (despite iOS issues). Take up for Silverlight-based infographics has been awful.
  • If you don't trust the data, don't use it.
  • As you do more and more, you start developing a code library that can speed up later projects.
  • Useful tool: Freebase
  • Book recommendation: The Tiger That Isn't: Seeing Through a World of Numbers
Enhanced by Zemanta

news:rewired - Marc Reeves keynote - #newsrw

Liveblogging highlights of a speech. Prone to inaccuracy, omission and typo

By bundling together thousands of readers with one publication, publishers deluded themselves into thinking they had a single community. On local papers,sports readers followed those oases but rarely read the rest of the paper - where the ads were. Online, that became clear as they went straight to the latest news about their team without going through the home page.

Traditional modes of ad and ed splits are outdated. Advertisers are part of the audience. It's always been about the relationship with the readers - and we deluded ourselves into thinking that it was about the content.

Other businesses are encroaching on our territory - why shouldn't we encroach on theirs?

If you want to serve a niche, get out of your comfortable journalism role and become a business person. We know our audience isn't cruising the net all day - so we concentrate on the times that they most often use the net. Mainly it's the pre-9am e-mail which drives 80% of the traffic to the story.

Marc reviews signups every day that he can, so he can monitor the audience - are some companies under-represented. They're ruthless about dumping activities that don't attract views or revenue. If they spends ages wiring on a feature that no bugger reads - they won't do that again.

Not surprisingly, the questions have started by questioning Marc's attacks on journalistic received wisdom. Can you go to companies for advertising even which you're covering them, asked one. Yes, says Marc. He doesn't use freelancers, but would if they came with a compelling business idea. He thinks national newspapers' structures cripple them and stop them making money online. He works in the heart of his readership so he's always bumping into them.

news:rewired - Involving Users in Projects #newsrw

Warning: Liveblogging - errors and typos likely

iVillage - Lulu Phongmany:

Been around for 10 years without really talking to the community about what they wanted. Very different issues drive success in message boards as opposed to content. Content seems tool-based, forums more around mutual support issues.

Food site relaunch: Editors and community managers are of equal footing in the approval process. Integrated community with content so there's no real distinction. In essence message board content is seen as no different to anything else. 285% up on page views.

The more options for participation, the better. Bake community into the whole editorial process.

Chris Taggart - OpenlyLocal

Journalists don't generally know much about anything - they aren't really interested in the subject, just the story. Fine for basic, traditional reporting. It worked because they had skills and access to information other people didn't have. And all this (cuttings libraries, directories, contacts) have been subsumed by the web. But it's still about the stories. And they can be focal points for conversations.
Your readers know more about the subject than you do. The thought of doing journalism without involving them is terrifying.

Naked Capitalism blog is a great example of journalism done with the audience.
Newspapers get blogs wrong because they're not used to having a conversation.

Paul Bradshaw - Birmingham City Uni, Help Me Investigate


Citizen journalism is a patronising and outdated term. It covers a ridiculously wide range of activities: accidental journalism, value adder, data analyst, the ear or eye of a group of friends...

Collaboration is about many groups, overlapping, and working in collaboration. A journalist is an ideal overlap point. Join the dots, make interesting connections. That's what Help Me Investigate has found in its investigations.

Help Me Investigate is essentially a project management tool for collaborative investigation.
How to get people involved: Don't ask, don't offer tokens; lead by example. Share.

news:rewired - Building Online Buzz #newsrw

Tony Curzon Price:

Master Curzon-Price - The Natural PHILOSOPHER at #newsrw on Twitpic


Job one: Unfolding Democracy. They tell the story of democracy as it expands across the web. They're funded by donations. Their agenda is to get news and analysis (quite serious) to the right audience.


Job two: Online editor of Intelligence Square - they do live and online events.


The goal is efficient distribution - the most efficient is everyone in the world consuming exactly the right piece of media. Our goal is create that. The goal of spammers is to disrupt it, the role of journalists is to create it. The Internet has made information distribution more and more efficient. It's far less likely now that you will miss an important piece of information to you.


He's giving a potted history of the Internet, from USEnet and gopher, through listservs, then forums and then search, blogs and RSS. Now we're moving beyond RSS into social distribution.

There are key hubs - for example, the Richard Dawkins forum can send an avalanche of traffic. But there's are diffuse networks, which compensate for lower traffic with higher. But the era of diffuse networks is ending. most of our time should be sent identifying the small, powerful networks. E-mail continues to be incredibly important.

Informational distribution efficiency is just getting better and better - and it's becoming less centralized, which ia bad news for search companies.

Vikki Chowney: Has split feeds for professional and personal, so people have a choice between interaction or just following the stories. Its about making it easy for people to read and share the content. One tool is AddThis, which they put on all stories. The started using Disqus comment management tool on the site earlier in the year. It makes it easier for people to strategy tracking the thread of conversation.

However, it's pointless trying to create buzz if you don't have great content. Reputation Online is in a fierce community. Traditional tools are useful: newsletters, meeting people face to face at events.


There's a limit to what one person can do. When you reach a certain size, you need to think about community manager who can track and get involved with conversations across the web.

Mike Harris, Libel Reform Campaign: Most visits come from links from communities like forums and blogs, the second group is from Twitter. People are referred to the site, people don't search for it. Even links in traditional orient media are important - but Twitter and Facebook are more important than a good Google ranking.... Stephen Fry drove nearly 2000 visits.

Social media is important: which bloggers, celebrities, people will drive the most attention? What do you want? We wanted money and signatures. We collected postcodes, and there were complaints, but we needed to prove that this wasn't just a niche campaign. Twitter and blogs make a lot of noise - but you need to work out how to translate that into action.



news:rewired: Peter Bale of Microsoft UK

Liveblogging: errors and typos likely

Peter Bale of Microsoft UK, whose building we're sitting in is kicking off the conference, and he's promised us it won't just be a product pitch.

Why are we doing this? For the audience. Within the UK audience there are many niches, some of which are very broad and deep.

He's given us some decent examples of using photo journalism and Microsoft tools like Bing maps and Photosynth to tell stories. And he's reminded us that this is a terrible time to be an average journalist hiding behind a corporate machinery.

He highlights Josh Halliday, a student journalist who has built his own brand, Jemima Kiss, Robert Andrews and Will Perrin.

More of a potted "stuff that's happening in journalism" talk than a strong agenda setter for a day on niche journalism, but a few ideas in his speech worth revisiting.


Location:A302,London,United Kingdom

June 24, 2010

What Really Drives People?

Everyone working in journalism and social media is aware of the problems and conflicts around changing working practices. I think this video has some surprising - and useful - lessons for us.

June 23, 2010

Standing Room Only…

Guess what’s on the meeting room screen at EG Towers right now:

IMG_0005

Stupid Journalism Stunts #1

dunce.jpgOnce in a while, I could across something so mind-bogglingly stupid that I'm forced to sit, slack-jawed and drooling, while my brain tries to hide from the infectious power of THE STUPID.


BBC Radio Scotland is running a journalism experiment of sorts today - pitting an office-based, but internet-enabled journalist against another hack only allowed to ferret out stories face-to-face without even so much as a mobile phone for company.

This is being characterised as being a clash of new journalism techniques and old ones. 

Hang on a second. My brain tried to hide from THE STUPID again. Give me a moment.

Right. Better now. Thanks. 

The false assumptions behind this experiment are so rife that there's a group of farmers already arguing for a cull, lest they become a threat to crops. So, the guy in the field is deprived of the new technology of mobile phones (as long as you define "new" as "three decades old"), yet the new journalist ... is also deprived of them. Insane.

The whole point of new technology - of mobile internet, mobile phones et al is that is should free journalists from their desks to get out and about. The idea that the internet ties you to your desk is so last decade that it hurts. And field journalists have been using mobile phones since the 80s at least. 

This appears to be a competition between a mid 90s journalist and one from the 1920s. And I'm afraid that anyone who thinks that this teaches them anything about journalism in the 21st century has already been infected by THE STUPID.

And there's no cure for that.

Photo by CogDogBlog on Flickr, used under a Creative Commons licence

Subject Coverage: journalists vrs bloggers

Bloggers versus Journalists: subject matter
[Created by Flowton from Pew data, discovered via We Are Social]

These appear to be US figures, but it's still interesting reading, particularly at the points of vast difference. Bloggers are far more interested in Science than the mainstream media, but significantly less obsessed with health stories. To their credit, bloggers care more about the environment, but run up a serious demerit for their celebrity obsession. 

June 22, 2010

Tether. End Of.

One way or another, it's been a long six months. I've made my usual mistake of not taking any significant time off for half the year, and am tired, niggly and unenthusiastic as a result. Holiday beckons.

But reading a couple of posts today has made me realise that there's another factor at work here:

Euan Semple:

Many moons ago, in the early days of blogging David Weinberger described it as "writing ourselves into existence". I was reminded recently of just how transformative blogging has been in my life.

Dave Weinberger:

I do find the possibility that I might blog an experience transforms that experience. I begin to compose the post in my head, even if I know I'm not actually going to write about it. I did this to some extent before the seventh day of creation (G-d rested, looked at what He had created, and then we started blogging complaints about i), but I now find myself shaping experience according to how I might present that experience in public: finding the words, deciding what might be interesting in the experience to someone other than me.

I find that applies equally as much to ideas as to experiences; that many of my ideas only truly clarify themselves and take a coherent form once they're locked down in the discipline of sentences, links, blockquotes and paragraphs that make up a blog post. And I've long used this blog as an outlet for that, thinking out loud, transferring stresses and ideas from my head to the digital page and out into the internet. Sharing concepts, and allowing them to return to me through others refined, challenged and improved.

However, I've actually been depriving myself of that process this year. Much of the work I've been doing hasn't appeared on this blog in anything but the most obscure form. The competitive environment around my work is much more intense that it was even a year ago, and I'm acutely aware that I'm read as much by our competitors as I am by my colleagues. There have been many, many posts I've started writing this year, and then abandoned because I find myself thinking that I'm sharing too much of what I'm being paid to think.

And thus too much is staying, unformed, undisciplined in my head. And this mass of unresolved, unwritten, undefined thinking is cluttering my mind, and adding to my general levels of stress.

Once I'm back from my break, I think I need to force myself to use my (neglected) internal blog much more, allowing those thoughts to take concrete form inside the firewall and amongst my colleagues, where they belong. To write my working self back into existence, but in a different form. 

RBI Sites Covering the Emergency Budget

June 18, 2010

Afternoon Tea Reading: National Newspapers

Some links about our friends in the nationals that have been hanging around in my Chrome tabs for too long now:


Publishing Saviours? I’m an Atheist

Kevin Anderson responding to my post from yesterday:

Senior leaders in the industry aren't looking for strategies, they are looking for a saviour. They want some supernatural - or in lieu of that, legislative - power to turn back the clock, put the genie back in the bottle, tax the internet and go back to the good old days when money just fell from the sky into their coffers. News flash: It's too late.

June 17, 2010

Complexity is the New Reality

A rather excellent rant from Mr Paul Bradshaw on the Curation is King cliché that's doing the rounds right now. Go and read it, and then join me back here...

Did you enjoy it? I think there's an important point underlying all of this - and that's a search of a magic bullet, the one solution that will allow publishers to transition painlessly to the digital age. From paywalls to "content is king" to iPad magazines to the newly-discovered enthusiasm for aggregation, which some of us were talking about four years ago, each is seen as simple solution to continue with something that feels much like business as usual.

But I think that's a doomed hunt.

There will not be one solution to the current malaise that affects our traditional business models, but a complex mix of all of the above. Great content has its role, as does thoughtful aggregation, and new publication channels. But so does building relationships with our readers and interacting with the wider online community, and new ways of reporting using the new tools. We need to find other ways of making money, other forms of value that we can provide for our markets, and which will have a symbiotic relationship with our journalism.

There is no easy answer, otherwise we'd have found it after over a decade. Complexity is the new reality. Clichés are just a crutch. 


June 16, 2010

Personnel Today goes online only

Personnel TodayJust popping my head above the work parapet a second to acknowledge the story that Personnel Today is going online only. Now, obviously there are sad elements to this - there's a net loss of eight jobs in this transition, which is never happy news. But on the other hand, I'm really looking forwards to what a very skilled web team can do with increased numbers and none of the tension that comes with serving two masters, as the inevitable pull of the print deadline pulls at their attention. And this is the first time we've transitioned a title from print/web hybrid, to a pure play web product. This news is the beginning of a story, not the end of one.

And it's very much a "horses for courses" situation round here right now. The story that Estates Gazette just had a big investment in a print redesign didn't get as much play....

June 15, 2010

End of an Era

The grand experiment is about to begin:


Now we find out if pay walls can work...

June 14, 2010

iPad Magazines: Not Beating The Web

Rearview

Image via Wikipedia

I have a "the problem with iPad magazine apps" post brewing within me, but I have a bit more research and a post on "why the iPad ain't a blogging workstation...yet" post to do first. In the meantime, there's a couple of other posts on the subject well worth a read. 

Monday Note has a great analysis of the current state-of-the-art for iPad magazine apps (and I use the phrase state-of-the-art with a significant number of caveats, there):

So, that's the first idea: simply browsing the web through Safari appears to seriously challenge publishers' efforts to create good applications. That could explain why many apps appear stuck in two weird modes. The first one involves encapsulating the web experience into an app, and coming up with a design closer to the original paper. For the second mode, newspapers and magazines choose to replicate the carbon-based reading experience on the iPad with PDF-based reading applications. Not exactly a great leap forward either.
That's certainly the biggest challenge for the app-based model. The web looks great on an iPad. Blogs, in particular, work brilliantly. The good, ol' fashioned reverse chronological flow is an almost perfect format for touch browsing. I've done more blog reading since I picked up my iPad than I have done in months. Possibly years, in fact. 

David Cushman of Faster Future cautions that apps could be leading publishers down a blind alley:

Too many traditional news vendors, it seems to me, see Apple's open hand as a way of reformatting/repackaging exactly what they've already done on the assumption that the reason we have been buying less newsprint is because it wasn't available in a beautiful digital format. That doesn't make sense to me. I don't sit on the train each morning pining for a copy of the Guardian to read. I get on with participation and interacting with other people discussing stuff that's way more relevant to me than the vast majority of stuff in ANY newspaper. 
While I agree with the broad sentiment here, there is a problem with the specific example given - trains are the one place where I can't guarantee an internet connection, even with my 3G iPad. I've worked around this mostly through the use of Instapaper to save those posts I want to consume at length, and have available offline for the train. Only one of the articles currently in my Instapaper account come from traditional media, though. 

I suspect the underlying message to these posts is this: publishers need to come up with a compelling app experience that beats out the web experience if they want customers to pony up for apps. Offline access might be part of that, but it's far from enough on its own. 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Headshot Framing for Beginners

Neil Oliver
Having just been contemptuous of one branch of Auntie Beeb, in the interests of balance, I should be complimentary about another part of the state-funded broadcaster.

And, luckily, I rather liked this post on the College of Journalism blog, which functions as an idiot's guide to framing headshots in an interesting way. I think there's plenty that videobloggers can learn from old media professionals, but it's stuff like this rather than "must use expensive cameras...". 

(I'm trying not to be annoyed by the next blog/previous blog links on that page. A post is not a blog.)
Enhanced by Zemanta

When Radio Talks Blogging, I Yell at the Radio

I am becoming one of those middle-aged guys who yells at the radio. I passed this terrible threshold of ageing yesterday, as I relaxed in the bath. I'm normally a shower guy, but once in a while I treat myself to a soak. And it's quite a treat. But this week, Radio 4 went and ruined it.

Sheila Dillon of the Food Programme was exploring the world of amateur food photography, a perfectly amiable subject for a soak. And, even better, it was featuring local (to me) blogger Ele of Kitchenist, and Blackheath Farmers Market, which I've been known to frequent

All very lovely, until Dillon asked how many people visited the blog. Near 400 daily, suggested Ele. "400 complete strangers going to your blog!" exclaimed Dillon, shock and surprise evident in her voice. This is, of course, where I started shouting.

Oh, God bless the mainstream media and their self-centred myopia. Heaven forbid that a well-written, entertaining amateur publication should pick up an audience without the support of the mainstream media. I work for a branch of the mainstream media, and I find this offensive and patronising. So goodness only knows what the blog-savvy, non-journalist listeners thought. 

It's a constant source of disbelief to me that so many journalists are so utterly unaware of the media landscape in which they live these days. And until that changes, I imagine I'll be shouting at the radio more and more...

June 12, 2010

What Does Facebook Like Do For Blog Traffic?

The Typepad team have just published a graph of referrals from Facebook since they made Facebook Like available as an option for their users:

Facebook referrals to Typepad
Now, admittedly, this is only from a few thousand blogs, and the figures are relative rather than absolute, but they still look significant to me. We launched our first blog with basic Facebook Like integration yesterday - World Cup Fever from Estates Gazette - and I'll be very interested to see how traffic from that pans out over the next month.

Enhanced by Zemanta

June 9, 2010

Nice New iPhone Photo App

Camera+, The Ultimate Photo App from Lisa Bettany on Vimeo.

Been playing with this app through today. Very impressed.

iPad Bloggery Continues

For the doubters, I am still using the iPad for my blogging:


And I'm just about getting the hang of it...


Location:The Quadrant,Sutton,United Kingdom

A Reader's Safari

If there's one thing I'm surprised that's gone unnoticed in all the kerfuffle following Apple's keynote on Monday, it's the launch of Safari 5 and, more specifically, the addition of its new Reader feature. What does it do? Well, it detects when there's something that approximates to an article on the page you're on, and gives you a little Reader icon in the URL field, in the same place you normally see the RSS icon. Click that, and you get the view in the picture.

It's a stripped-down, easy to read version of the article, with all the page clutter gone. It's, frankly, lovely - a really good way to focus down on the content without being distracted by all the stuff we shove around the main point of the page.

A couple of people have suggested that publishers should be afraid of this - after all, it takes away all the advertising and links to other material. However, the Reader is only triggered once you hit the page, and you return to the original page as soon as you click outside the reader area. Indeed, providing intelligent places for readers to go next probably becomes even more important, as the Reader strips out the links within the content.

It does make me wonder if some of the design ideas from the iPad (or should I be calling it iOS now?) are finding their way back into the desktop products.


June 7, 2010

An iPad Blogging Experiment

Time to get serious with my iPad experiments this week, I think. I'm going to try to do all my blogging from the iPad. I'll try to tally my successes and failures as I go. 
 
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Location:Procter St,Camden Town,United Kingdom

June 4, 2010

Things I Failed To Blog About

Just clearing down some tabs that I meant to blog about - but never got around to. They're worth a look, though.

  1. Some really interesting stuff about journalists as programmers. Bet nobody clicks that link on a sunny Friday afternoon with the pubs open...
  2. The good and bad side of enforcing real name on comments. Another reason why "one size fits all" approaches fail.
  3. A video in which Arianna Huffington will annoy a lot of people by talking about her business model. You might not agree with her philosophy - but it's interesting. 
  4. James gets wound up by The Times' paywall model. Why am I posting these sorts of links on a Friday evening? Who knows.
  5. Look, have some Wurzels and let's call it quits. 

Are They Trying To Tell Me Something?

This is the view from my desk at Estates Gazette right now:

My desk at EG
Each week, those plants seem to move more firmly in front of me. Are they hiding the break out area from me...or me from the breakout area? :-)

On Newspapers Stealing Bloggers' Journalism

Just to counterbalance the "bloggers are parasites on our work" meme that seems prevalent in some publishing circles:

On Friday, I broke a tasty story about a woman suing Google, claiming bad directions caused her to get hit by a vehicle. Today, I discover our story is everywhere, often with no attribution. Come along and watch how the mainstream media, which often claims bloggers rip it off, does a little stealing of its own.
It's a compelling story of the shameless arrogance and disrespect some papers treat people breaking stories - and how calling them out can have an impact. 

June 3, 2010

Jobs, Blogs and Media Money

So, Mr Steve Jobs of Apple, Inc took to the stage at All Things Digital's D8 event earlier in this week, and actually had some interesting things to say about the way Apple views the world, their clashes with Google and Adobe, and the relationship between the iPad and iPhone. 

However, my eyebrow did a Roger Moore-esque twitch at this:

"I don't want us to see us descend into a nation of bloggers," says Jobs. "I think we need editorial oversight now more than ever. Anything we can do to help newspapers find new ways of expression that will help them get paid, I am all for."

There have been some good rebuttals of his financial arguments, of which Mathew Ingram's is probably the best. But it's the first half of the quote that surprised me: the dismissal of bloggers. On reflection, though, it shouldn't have, for a number of reasons. For one, it's clearly being used as shorthand for the difference between professional news-gatherers and the amateurs, rather than a dismissal of blogging as a method of publishing per se. We know that Jobs reads Daring Fireball, for a start. For another, Apple's recent run-ins with a blogger over an, uh, misplaced iPhone 4G are well documented.

However, I think it's deeper than that. Apple is a company founded on the idea of control - they control news about their new products ruthlessly. They control the user experience of people using their devices. They control the very hardware that the user experience is found on. Apple's success is predicated on control. They are, in the parlance of online journalism discussion, gatekeepers. And thus it's no surprise that Jobs values the gatekeeping function of  newspapers over the free-for-all open debate of the web. 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

On "Online" Blogs

Print subs, print journalists and print editors: I have a plea for you.

I know many of you don't like technology, and assume that your readers don't, too. But really, using the phrase "online blog" just makes you look stupid. How many offline blogs have you come across?  Exactly

So, either the word "online" is completely redundant, and should be virtuously struck down by any competant sub, or it's masquerading as an explanation of "blog" - but how much useful information does it actually give? Virtually none. 

Either explain the damn word, or omit the "online". Doing what you're doing right now gives the impression of you (metaphorically) holding the word at arm's length, like it carries a bad smell. The medium is over a decade old now. I think we can move on from that. 

I may have blogged about this before. But it still annoys me. 

June 1, 2010

The Times, They Are a'iPadding

So, I got one. My iPad arrived late last Thursday evening, and I've been experimenting with it ever since. I'll be posting my general impressions of the device on another blog entirely, sparing those of you who don't care about such things from the long series of posts that will follow. However, I will be exploring the media apps and potential of the device as a journalistic tool right here on this blog, and I'd like to start with one that's bound to attract some attention: The Times iPad app

The Times iPad app
Here's the deal: £9.99 buys you one month of use of the app. The download purchase price covers the first month, and it's in-app purchasing through your iTunes account from then on. As far as I can see there's no link with payment for the forthcoming paywalled sites right now. And what you're buying is not access to a website - this is downloaded content. The first time you open the app each day, you're prompted to download that day's issue. In other words, this app uses the internet, but not the web. Oh, and you don't get the Sunday Times. That will have it's own app, which is currently in production

By my reckoning, you're paying less than 40p per issue, which is a chunk cheaper than the paper product, which is a pound a throw right now, but you're getting less content for your money. This is more the highlights of the paper, rather than the whole thing.
Continue reading The Times, They Are a'iPadding.

Archives

Follow me on App.net

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from June 2010 listed from newest to oldest.

May 2010 is the previous archive.

July 2010 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.