Recently in Journalism Category

This is significant:

In the last six months, we've seen uploads from mobile phones to YouTube jump 1700%; just since last Friday, when the iPhone 3GS came out, uploads increased by 400% a day. 

If you're still thinking in terms of a 12-hour turn around for online news video, you're dead in the water. 
Oh, OK. Misleading headline. More actually, London's mayor went to Westfield's new Stratford shopping centre to celebrate the topping out of the John Lewis store there. And an EG journalist was there with a Flip Video camera in hand to record Boris Johnson giving a speech at Stratford:


Another way journalists can get more value out of these junkets without much additional effort or cost. Carry the audience with you into the event.
Goo on my screen
A couple of conversations I've had recently have brought forth a revelation in my holiday-deprived brain. One of the big challenges for media organisations looking to get good journalistic blogging going is ownership.

Now, I'm not talking ownership in the traditional "who owns the copyright" sense - because in most cases it's pretty clear that the employer does. I'm talking about the feeling that most good bloggers I know have that the blog is theirs - their space, hosted by them.

Certainly we've found that group blogs rarely work, unless the team has a close-knit identity and a clue about blogging already (and I must acknowledge the recent work of Stacey and her team in disproving my previous mantra that group blogs don't work at RBI). And, in contrast, bloggers who feel a strong sense of ownership of their blog, and shape it with their own personality and enthusiasm reap the traffic and engagement rewards for the company.
I was up in Suffolk briefly at the weekend, and took the opportunity to grab some photos with my new iPhone. The church offered some good opportunities to test the selective focus/exposure on the latest model. For instance, this photo was focused on the carving:

St Andrews, Bramfield (head focus)And this one on the window itself:

St Andrews, Bramfield (window focus)I think touch to focus is the single most impressive feature of the iPhone 3GS. It's a beautifully simple way of giving you focus and exposure control without introducing a host of buttons and menus. And in terms of grabbing photos quickly in the field, it's exceptionally easy and intuative.

The camera's low light performance still won't win any awards, and 3 megapixels is low by most standards, but for quick, easy fodder for online reporting, it's pretty darn handy. 


Here's the Olympics site in east London, as shot from a train on the new iPhone 3GS:

The Olympics Site, Stratford from Adam Tinworth on Vimeo.

Quite impressive, for a phone. If I had a Flip Mino rather than a Flip Mino HD, it would be right to feel rather threatened right now.

(Anyone interested in the Olympics site might find this blog an interesting read.)

And so, e-mails and tweets arrive asking what I think of the exposure of anonymous police blogger NightJack by The Times. I think you should probably read the couple of compilations of links that Judith has done on journalism.co.uk and her own blog. And I think you should probably read what another anonymous police blogger, PC Bloggs says about it. And you should remember that The Times has form here.

But if you want to know what I, personally, think, here it is:

Ah, the fuss around Digital Britain is growing, isn't it? And I don't just mean the report - I mean how Britain looks in a digital future. Events like a judge giving The Times approval to reveal the identity of an anonymous police blogger, or evidence being given to select committees seem to be marking battle lines between traditional media and the new breed of small, passionate upstarts.

I quite liked these posts written in reponse which give a glimpse into what the media future might actually look like. 853 cites existing south east London sites that need nurturing more than the traditional model:

There's already a variety of different types of community site - greenwich.co.uk has cash backing while volunteer-run Brockley Central has evolved quickly from its beginnings as a local blog. The daddies of them all are Brixton's Urban 75 - run for love - and London SE1, which also incorporates a print version of its local news site. These are what need nurturing, not the busted flushes based far from the areas they claim to serve. All have varying elements of local news, but all have the same stated commitment to their patches.

And Rick Waghorn covers some basic facts of new publishing in a marvellously entertaining rant:

Last time I looked, I had some c35,000 uniques, on average visiting three-and-a-half times a month and when they did, average 'engagement' time was the better part of seven minutes. Varied, by month; by the team's performance - January, when the transfer window opens, we have an absolute ball...

As will the football section of any 'ThisIsSomething' site... big, sticky content delivered online to a passionate, niche audience.
And once unbundled from the broad and damning brushstroke delivered by Ms Enders, those people deliver the kind of demographics advertisers like. I've got the British Army signed up on a 12-month deal; cos our core audience is 16-30 males. Bingo.

There's no rule that says the media that emerges from this transformative phase we're going through has to look anything like the media we have now.

A couple of people have asked me what I think of the #cnnfail situation, with live Twittering from Iran exposing the conflict there, but the major news networks not starting to cover it until hours later. I haven't really felt inclined to write anything because, well, I'm not quite sure what to make of it just yet. It's obvious that putting the ability to report events in real time into the hands of huge swathes of people is changing what we expect of the news services. That much is clear. The fact that news organisations are falling back on the "what's on Twitter can't be trusted" defence proves that they know there is an issue - and don't know how to cope either.

Clay Shirky's thoughts, available on the TED Blog, are worth considering:

I'm sure that for the majority of the country, events in Iran are not of grave interest, even if those desperate for CNN's Iran info couldn't get access to it. That push model of one message for all is an incredibly crappy way of linking supply and demand. CNN has the same problem this decade that Time magazine had last decade. They simultaneously want to appeal to middle America and leading influencers. Reaching multiple audiences is increasingly difficult. The people who are hungry for info on events of global significance are used to instinctively switching on CNN. But they are realizng that that reflex doesn't serve them very well anymore, and that can't be good for CNN.
And it's worth checking out Richard Sambrook's analysis, too:

Social media can be a huge benefit in news coverage - not least it was one of the few ways for people in Iran to communicate with the west. But mediation by people who understand the story and don't have a particular agenda to advance is still needed to get a grasp of what has, and hasn't, actually happened and a measured sense of proportion. What was evident on Twitter this weekend was the accelerating effects of a continuous news cycle and appetite. Just as 24 hour news channels must stay on air with some kind of coverage, social media is even hungrier. And noise fills the void when events or facts can't.
So. We know that people involved in breaking news can report in real time, from the ground of a major event. They don't need the mediation of journalists to spread their experience. And we know that people with access to those reports are reshaping their expectations of news organisations in the light of it. And we know that waiting hours before you respond to this is not going to meet audience expectations. So, what value can journalists bring to this situation? Ignoring it just isn't an option.
The pace of change is astonishing right now. In the next 48 hours or so we'll see a new version of the iPhone OS and a new iPhone with video recording and better photographic options - and thus a potentially more useful mobile reporting tool.

Tweetdeck 0.26 PCBut Twitter client development is moving even faster than mobile platform development, with a new version of Tweetdeck for desktops and a brand, sparkling new iPhone version realeased this morning. Tweetdeck is many people's preferred Twitter app on the desktop, if only for it's ability to create groups and then view multiple different stream at once. It's major weakness has been the fact that you can only manage one Twitter account in it at a time. Well, that weakness is gone with the new release. I'm now tracking both of my active Twitter accounts at the same time, and that's a huge improvement in its usability.

But there's something more significant in this release, something that ties in very closely with the iPhone release: the launch of the Tweetdeck account. Signing up for a free account within the app allows your column states to be synced between different devices. This means that, in theory, you should be able to open the app on your work PC, your home Mac or your iPhone - and see exactly the same set of columns. This ability to maintain perfect synchronisation states could give the app a huge advantage over clients like Seesmic Desktop - because it reduces the imput you need to keep everything working the way you like. At the moment, it appears that only column and group states sync, rather than accounts, meaning you need to do a little set-up on each device - but after that it all works very smoothly.

Two Flight Global bloggers using video to round up day one of the Paris Air Show:


About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the Journalism category.

Blogging is the previous category.

Podcasting is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Subscribe to OM&HB

Subscribe via e-mail:

Advert

Archives