Why unleash the James Bonds of this world, when much of the work can be done at your desk with fake social media profiles?
Political polarisation leads to self-righteousness, and that leads to evil…
How we've recreated the channels of the past in the social media of today.
Amber Rudd does not understand encryption. That's a problem.
The early signs of Russian interference in Western politics were there - why didn’t we take them more seriously?
Unease about Facebook and its role in our polity is only growing - and a London Review of Books piece made it clear exactly why.
As early as late last year, the CIA was worried that politicians in the USA were not taking election interference seriously.
Talking of trolling, the New Yorker published an interesting piece by Adrian Chen, looking at what happened when a pro-Trump Reddit-dwelling troll was suddenly brought into the glare of publicity when his Gif went viral — and his true identity was established.
Suddenly, his behavior became more than pixels on a screen. It had consequences:
For HanAssholeSolo, though, his gif episode showed him what most of us instinctively know—that our online lives are intricately woven into our real ones, and that freedom of speech is not an excuse for a lack of empathy, even “behind a keyboard.” This was “an extreme wake up call,” he wrote in his apology. “To people who troll on the Internet for fun, consider your words and actions conveyed in your message and who it might upset or anger. Put yourself in their shoes before you post it.”
If there’s one thing that these trolls and the traditional media have had in common for a long time, it’s been the idea that virtual interactions were in some way inferior to physical one, that they counted less – if at all.
Both groups are slowly learning how very untrue that idea is.
It's voting day in the UK - and this vote does matter.
Martin Belam argues that the lack of digital understanding amongst political journalists is hindering reporting. He's right.